Random Play High Brow, Low Brow, No Brow
Feb 142009

Just behind me, on the floor in front of the chair that my great-grandfather made, is a pile of books.

To be more accurate, three piles of books, about 9 per stack. It’s my fiction hoard that won’t fit on the shelves in the hallway, where we keep our fiction.

Over my left shoulder are two more stacks, standing guard in front of the shelf that’s home to oversize art books. They, in turn, are beneath my photography books, poetry books, sociology and political books, history and current affairs books.

If I raise my eyes from the keyboard for a moment (I’ve never been able to master touch typing) there is a shelf of reference books:
two regular dictionaries;
two crossword dictionaries;
a synonym finder;
a Roget’s Thesaurus;
Schott’s Almanac 2009;
two volumes of ‘Passing Time in the Loo’;
a couple of David Wallechinsky’s massive compendia of trivia;
a dictionary of Latin phrases;
a dictionary of human thought;
a compact version of ‘The Times Atlas of the World’;
a rhyming dictionary;
a couple of books of quotations.

builtforbooks

Valhalla

Walk out of the study, across the hall and into the family room, and you’ll find music books, travel books, film books, card game books, puzzle books and the Children’s Britannica.

In the loft, four shelving units house most of our hardback fiction, biography, Eastern philosophy, psychology, science and craft books.

Even the kitchen has a three-shelf unit, stacked with cookbooks and gardening books.

I shudder to think how much I have spent over the past forty years amassing this collection. Actually, I don’t – because I no longer think about it. I tried that a few years ago, in the hope of worrying myself into a stop, but it didn’t work. I continued to buy more than I read.

And yet the list of things I discover I am supposed to have read grows ever-longer. Today I found a ‘1001 Books to Read Before You Die’ website, which categorised the selection into centuries. Of the seventy-or-so from the 2000s I own six and have read one.

Which set me thinking about earlier masterpieces that have escaped my purview: huge swathes of C19th classics shouting for my attention; warehouses of postmodernism demanding my time; giants of the Great American Novel standing defiantly, looking for a literary fight.

A fight that I will never win.

Each time I turn up a list of the books I should have read, I discover titles of which I have no knowledge. By writers I do not know.

Here’s an example; Time Magazine’s All Time 100 Novels (although it only goes back to 1923, the year Time was first published). This list includes Death Comes for the Archbishop (Willa Cather), Their Eyes Were Watching for God (Zora Neale Hurston) and Dog Soldiers (Robert Stone). All US novels, but that’s not the point. Taking the editors’ choices at face value, they are among the greatest ever written – and I’ve never heard of them.

I used to find this thrilling; now it just induces guilt.

Guilt that I consume my fair share of pop fiction (even highly respected crime writers like George Pelecanos and Richard Price are, let’s face it, hardboiled entertainers). But also guilt when  I am reading books that are suppose to be good for me – like Mark Thomas’ very funny polemic about Coca Cola, and Ben Goldacre’s attack on the media’s treatement of science and health.

While I’m trying to get to stay ahead in my understanding of the modern world, a little voice (which is getting ever louder) keeps saying:

“What about Dostoyevsky or Tolstoy? What about Dickens or Hardy? Or Austen or Bronte? Even Bellow or Updike?”

My elder son is putting me to shame. Like many young men in their late teens, he’s a fan of horror, and so is returning to original sources – he’s halfway through Bram Stoker’s Dracula, with Shelley’s Frankenstein next on the bedside table.

I’ve read neither.

And I’ve reached a stage where I notice that there are more unticked boxes on the list than there are ticks. More gaps than fill-ins. More ignorance than bliss.

personal_library

Nirvana

And so I have a request of the book trade.

Please stop.

Given that publishers don’t make any money, that only James Patterson and Jacqueline Wilson earn anything from public lending rights, and that we’re all going to spend another fortune moving our paperback collections onto Sony Readers or Amazon Kinders (like we did with VHS-to-DVD, and we’re expected to again with Blu-Ray), can we just press the pause button for a little while?

The sum total of human wisdom, love and folly has already been well documented. There is no need for yet another variation on any of the well-worked themes. We’re done.

If there are, indeed 1001 masterpieces to read before I die, then I don’t need any more. That’s enough, already. Do the maths: 300 pages per book, 500 words a page; that’s 150 million words I have to get through.

Well, I’ve checked my diary, and I’m busy for the next 30 years. So please stop.

Popularity: 4% [?]

  • Share/Bookmark
  • I think my big question would be "Why keep the (fiction)ones you have read?"

    Are you really going to read them again considering all that is yet untapped. Probably not is the answer.

    Ok. Keep a few, and I mean a few, favourites just in case. By that, I mean just in case you want to share your joy and lend/give it to some inquisitive soul who says late one night "do you know I have never read......"

    The rest should just go off to a deserving home. In a week or so you will even forget that you ever owned it.
  • David Thornton
    Didn't you have a major clear out a couple of years ago?

    I am not sure if I should thank you for linking to that Listology site as it looks the sort of place I could waste hours adding to my list of stuff I "must" read, see and hear, when I might be better just getting on with the stuff already accumulated.

    FWIW checking the 69 odd books from the 2000's on the "1001 Books You Must Read Before You Die" list, I note that we own and I have read ten of them, we only own a copy of one other which Jane has read and I have no intention of picking up (Carol Shield's "Unless"). This comes as a surprise and an aberration as you well know I am a fellow addict and have my own large to read pile.


    You recall those enormous shelves in the clock tower?. The joiner who made them couldn't believe anyone would need so much space for books. Well seven years later and I am double stacking. Jane is rightly ignoring the suggestion that we put a bookcase on the landing as she knows it would be full before long and the collection would start to spill down the stairs.

    I made an effort to face up to this problem a couple of years ago. Maybe it was my own midlife crisis or perhaps just acceptance of my own mortality, that I reckoned that at my current rate of consumption of 30 odd books a year and given a fair wind 30 years left to me then I had only 900 books left in me. This called for action;

    - stop reading crap. So far I haven't read as many of the missing classics as promised but I have ticked off a few of those "it would be a bit embarrassing to admit I haven't read it" ones. (Yes there's a list available if you are really interested).The occasional piece of crap still passes the quality threshold, why in heavens name did I pick up Tony Parsons' last one?.

    - don't feel the obligation to read everything by an author. It's the completist in me, I have read everything published by some even their turkeys. Now I am attempting to only read the best by the best.

    A while back I bought one of those shrinkwrapped Penguin bundles, ten Steinbecks for £9.99 who could resist?. Worked my way through the obvious and delving into the fourth or fifth realised it wasn't very good, was I really go to read all ten. It wasn't easy for an inveterate hoarder but most ended up at the charity shop. Still held onto "East of Eden" though.

    - one in one out. I trawled the shelves and stacked everything unread into one pile and resolved not add to it until it was sharply reduced. Well it's probably a bit smaller but not much. I also resolved to acknowledge my expenditure by buying books for others. Every book I now purchase something for myself I make an equivalent donations here;

    http://www.bookaid.org/cms.cgi/site/index.htm

    - cut down on other reading. Given up daily newspapers but there's still the weekend doorsteps, my magazine subscriptions and is Granta a magazine or book?.

    - enough,enough. Accept and give up on some subjects where I really don't need to know any more (WW2) or will never get (magic realism).

    - stop reading big books. Yes I know this sounds a bit soft but do I really want to invest my time in some of the modern lauded doorsteps?. I don't give up on books, once started I will complete so I'm not sure I really want to commit to Middlesex or Infinite Jest (despite your rave comments on the latter).Easier to do this with fiction than other areas like my interest in history.

    Sorry this has turned in a longer ramble than planned. One last thought - I never did find you on Librarything?
blog comments powered by Disqus