Civilization Gwen Day 1918 – 2009
Dec 052009

I was a threat to National Security yesterday: I took a photo in a public place.

This time I managed to avoid detection, slipping the pocket camera back into my bag before the SWAT team swooped into action. Others haven’t been so fortunate, as The Independent reported on Thursday:

hand on lensNovember BBC photographer Jeff Overs stopped and searched while he takes sunset photographs of St Paul’s Cathedral.

November Andrew White, 33, is stopped after taking photographs of Christmas lights on his way to work in Brighton. He is asked to give his name and address.

August Police order trainspotter Stephen White to delete images of train carriages taken during a holiday in Wales. CCTV near an oil refinery monitored him taking the pictures and alerted local police. Mr White refused.

July Alex Turner, an amateur photographer, arrested under anti-terrorism laws for taking pictures of two officers as they question him for photographing a fish and chip shop in Kent. Later released without charge.

April Two Austrian tourists told to delete pictures of Walthamstow bus station. Unaware that police have no right to enforce deletion of images without a warrant, they comply.

I have been stopped twice; once outside a  shopping mall (where the CCTV boys had ‘caught’ me and sent an enforcer, even though I was standing on a public highway) and once along the Embankment. In one case, I was trying to make art, in the other,  wanting to celebrate my culture. Fortunately, unlike Mr Overs, I wasn’t trying to earn my living.

As Henry Porter in his Guardian blog today so eloquently puts it, this is an outrageous infringement of a civil liberty, and  – whether you’re a happy-snapper or a committed shutterbug – an issue that should concern everyone.

Popularity: 55% [?]

  • Share/Bookmark
  • David Thornton
    The current government granted rights to local councils to access personal data and undertake surveillance on individuals for the most doubtful of reasons.

    Legilsation passed supposedly for national security purposes is now regularly used;

    - by local council employees to search out for miscreants who send their kids to schools outside catchment, don't recycle , take pictures of buses and shopping centres as you and Paul have both described,
    - to stop people legitimately protesting against government policy,
    - to maintain the world's largest DNA database including samples from people who have never been charged with any crime.

    Then we have their attempts to bang people away for 90 days on the word of a policeman

    and don't get me started on ID cards.....

    None of this legislation was (rightly) deemed necessary when we faced a much more serious threat to our national security during the 1970's. All we have ended up with is a seriously disenchanted population who certainly don't feel any safer and mighty pissed off at the constant interference by the state in even the simplest aspect of their lives.
blog comments powered by Disqus